References

• McClure, C. R., Hernon, P., & Relyea, H. C. (pnyt.). United States Government Information Policies: Views and Perspectives, hlm. 271-295. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Milevski, S. 1986. Information policy through public laws of the 95th-98th Congresses, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting (23)211-219.
• Muir, A. & Oppenheim, C. 2002a. Report on developments world-wide on national information policy. http://www. la-hq.org.uk/directory/prof_issues/nip/index.html [7 Ogos 2006].
• Nilsen, K. E. 1997b. The Canadian Information Policy Bibliography. Information Policy Research Program, Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto. Working Paper No. 7. Toronto, ON. ISBN: 0-7727-0418-X
• Nilsen, K. E. 2000. Impact of Information Policy: Measuring the Effects of the Commercialization of Canadian Government Statistics. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
• Oladele, B. A. 2001. The imperative of challenges for Africa in the knowledge age: status and role of national information policy. 67th IFLA Council and General Conference 16-25.
• Oli Mohamed Abdul Hamid. 1991. Formulating a national policy on library and information services in Malaysia. Libri 41: 133-143.
• Orna, E. 2008. Information policies: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Journal of Information Science 34(4): 547-565.
• Pajaro, R. & Betancourt, V. 2007a. What is a national information policy? Dlm. Aballi, I.F. (pnyt.). Building national information policies: Experiences in Latin America, hlm. 20-27. Kingston: UNESCO.
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Ed. ke-3. London: Sage Publications. Porat, M. U. 1977. The information economy: definition and measurement. Washington: Office of Telecommunication. Powell, R. R. 1991. The role of LIS education. Dlm.
• Mcclure, C. R. & Hernon, P. (pnyt.). Library and information science research: Perspectives and strategies for improvement, hlm. 15-30. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Priftis, A. & Oppenheim, C. 1999. Development of a national information policy in Greece. Information Development 15(1): 32-43.
• Roos, A. 1998. Input paper by the Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology for the information society conference. Dlm. Henrici, I. 2004. Approach to the formulation of a national information policy for South Africa. South African Journal of Library & Information Science 70(1): 30-38.
• Rowlands, I. 1996. Understanding information policy: concepts, frameworks and research tools. Journal of Information Science 22(1): 13-25.
• Rowlands, I. 1998. Some compass bearing for information policy orienteering. Aslib proceeding 50(8): 230-237.
• Rowlands, I., Eisenschitz, T. & Bawden, D. 2002. Frame analysis as a tool for understanding information policy. Journal of Information Science 28(1): 31–38.
• Schwuchow, W. 1999. The role of government in the information society: lessons from Germany. Business Information Review 16(2): 69-106.
• Silverman, D. 2001. Interpreting qualitative data methods for analysing talks, text and interaction. Ed. Ke-2. London: Sage Publications.
• Smith, K. 2004. Federal information policy: putting it all together. Information Services & Use 24: 59-72. Stone, M. B. 1996. National information policies: are they possible to formulate? ADRC, Canada.
• Stroetmann, K. A. & Schwuchow, W. 1992. Information policy in the Federal Republic of Germany: Development, Analysis, Perspective. Journal of Information Science 18: 161-170.
• Trauth, E. M. 1986. An integrative approach to information policy research. Telecommunication Policy 1: 41-50.
• Travers, M. 2001. Qualitative research through case studies. London: Sage Publications. Uhlir, P.F. 2004. Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Governmental Public Domain Information. CI-2004/WS/5). Paris: UNESCO. 56 UNESCO. t.th. National information policy - differing approaches. UNESCO Regional office for Communication & Information. Bangkok: United Nations. http://www.wam.umd.edu/~rmazzone/Information%20Law%20&%20 Policy%20-%20August%20%202005/Chapter%206%20%20Privacy&%20Infosharing/CLIS _INFO_POLICY_ class_1_REPORT_UN_national_information_policy_differing_approaches.pdf [8 Disember 2006].
• Webster, F. 1995. Information society. Dlm. Drake, M.A. (pnyt.). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, hlm. 1338-1357. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
• Wesley-Tanaskovic, I. 1985. Guidelines on national information policy: (scope, formulation and implementation). Paris: UNESCO.
• Wild, K. 1996. The RDP’s national information project. Dlm. Henrici, I. 2004. Approach to the formulation of a national information policy for South Africa. South African Journal of Library & Information Science 70(1): 30-38.
• Wolcott, H. F. 2001. Writing up qualitative research. Ed. ke-2. London: Sage Publications.
• Xue, S. 2005. Internet policy and diffusion in China, Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Information Science 31(3): 238-250.
  

Back