Sains Malaysiana 34(2): 61-66 (2005)
Menyukat kecekapan Jabatan: Pendekatan Multikriteria
(Measuring Effiiency in a Department: Multicriteria Approach)
Abdul Aziz Jemain & Khairul Anuar Mohd Ali
Pusat Pengajian Sains Matematik
Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
ABSTRAK
Kertas ini membincangkan penyukatan kecekapan jabatan menggunakan kaedah pembuatan pemutusan multi-kriteria. Indeks kecekapan yang dihasilkan memanfaatkan kaedah urutan keutamaan irasan selesaian ideal secara berperingkat. Pemberat keutamaan diperoleh menggunakan nilai vektor eigen bagi membolehkan korelasi antara kriteria diambil kita dalam pembinaan indeks kecekapan. Data yang dikumpul dari lapan puluh Jabatan Penilaian Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan seluruh Semenanjung Malaysia digunakan sebagai contoh serta asas pembinaan indeks kecekapan.
Kata kunci: indeks gubahan, korelasi, kecekapan
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses a method for measuring efficiency. The method was based on multi-criteria decision making. Index of efficiency bases on technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution is suggested. The weights used for the efficiency index were obtained using eigenvector of covariance matrix in order to incorporate the correlation between criteria. Data were collected from eighty Local Authorities in Peninsular Malaysia were used as illustration for the construction of efficiency index.
Keywords: composite index, correlation, efficiency
RUJUKAN/REFERENCES
Abdul Aziz Jemain. 2002. Penentuan wajaran dalam pembinaan indeks pelbagai criteria. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Sains Keputusan. Universiti Utama Malaysia, 7-11.
Abdul Aziz Jemain. 2003. Indeks kemajuan antara daerah di Semenanjung Malaysia. Laporan teknik Pusat Pengajian Sains Matematik, Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Deng, H, Yeh, C.H. & Willis, R.J. 2000. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computer & Operations Research 27: 963-973.
Herrera, F. & Herrera-Vedma, E. 2000. Linguistic decision analysis: steps forsolving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Set and Systems 115: 67-82.
Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. & Ruan. D. 2004. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics 87: 171-184.
Kahraman, C., Ruan, D. & Dogan, I. 2003. Fuzzy group decision making for facility location selection. Information Sciences 157: 135-153.
Khairul Anuar, M.A. 2002. Hubungan amalan pengurusan kualiti cemerlang dengan kepuasan pelanggan dalaman dan prestasi organisasi pihak berkuasa tempatan di Semenanjung Malaysia. Desertasi PhD. Universiti Utama Malaysia. Sintok.
Lee, J. & Kuo, J.Y. 1998. Fuzzy decision making through trade-off analysis between criteria. Journal of Information Sciences 107: 107-126.
Li, D.F. & Yang, J.B. 2004. Fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making in fuzzy environments. Information Sciences 158: 263-275.
Ray, A.M. 1989. On the measurement of certain aspects of social development. Social. Indicators Research 21: 35-92.
Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Takeda E., Cogger, K.O. & Lu, P.L. 1987. Estimating criterion weights using eigenvectors: A comparative study. European journal of Operational Research 2: 360-369.
Triantaphyllou, E. 2000. Multi-Criteria decision making methods. A comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht/Boston/London.
Tsai, H.C. & Hsiao, S.W. 2004. Evaluation of alternative for product customization using fuzzy logic. Information Sciences 158: 233-262.
Tsaur, S.H. Chang, T.Y. & Yen, C.H. 2002. The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management 23: 107-115.
Wang, J. & Lin, Y.I. 2003. A fuzzy multicriteria group decision making approach to select configuration items for software development. Fuzzy Set and Systems 134: 343-363.
Zanakis, S.H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N. & dublish, S. 1998. Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operation Research 107: 507-529.
|