The
Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences Vol 11 No 1 (2007): 314 – 323
GAMMA HAZARDS AND RISK ASSOCIATED WITH NORM IN
SEDIMENT FROM AMANG PROCESSING RECYCLING PONDS
Nasirian Mohsen1 , Ismail Bahari, Pauzi1
Abdullah, Azizah Jaafar2
1Faculty of Science and Technology,
2Faculty of Information Science & Technology,
Universiti
Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600, Bangi,
Selangor, Malaysia
Abstract
Amang
processing is an important down stream activity of tin mining noted for
technologically enhan cing naturally occurring radioactive materials. A study
was carried out to determine the gamma
radiation hazards associated with amang
processing with special
reference to the
sediment accumulated in
amang processing ponds.
Twenty eight sediment samples
from two amang processing plants employing the recycling close water management
system were collected and analysed. The activity concentrations of 226Ra,
232Th and 40K in sediments were measured using gamma
spectrometry analysis, with a Hyper Pure Ge-Li detector coupled to a Multi
Channel Analyzer detector system. The range of mean activity concentrations of 226Ra,
232Th and 40K were between 40.94 – 189.58 Bq kg-1, 104.90 – 516.17 Bq
kg-1 and 74.8-848.0 Bq/kg respectively. The maximum activity
concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K
recorded were higher than Malaysia’s
average and the world’s natural
highest. Gamma Radiation Representative Level Index,
Iγr associated with these levels of activity
concentrations of radionuclides in sediments,
warrants an immediate attention from the regulatory authorities. The
contribution of amang processing and the use of recycling close water
management system in enhancing potential environmental radiological risk are
discussed.
Keywords: NORM, tin
tailing, amang, sediment, gamma spectrometry, radiological risk.
References
1. Ismail
B., Othman M.& Soog H.F. 2000. Effect of tin dredging on the environmental
concentration of Arsenic, Chromium and
Radium-226 in soil and water. J. Sains Nuclear Malaysia. 18(1) 107-116.
2. B.
Ismail, Y. Redzuwan, R.S. Chua, W. Shafiee. 2001. Radiological impact of the
amang processing industry on neighboring residents. Applied Radiation And
Isotopes. 54. p. 393-397 .
3. Azlina
M. J., Ismail B., Muhamad -Samudi Y, Taiman K. 2001. Work activity,
radiation dosimeters and external dose
measurement in amang processing plant . J. Sains Nuclear Malaysia. 19(1&2).
p. 31 -39.
4. A.
M. Yusof, M. N. Mahat, N. Omar, A. K. H. wood. 2001. Water quality studies in
an aquatic environment of disused tin mining pools and in drinking water.
Ecological Engineering. 16, issue 3. p. 405-414.
5. Muhamat
Omar. 2000. International conference on the safety radioactive waste
management. Cordoba Spain, IAEA - CN-78. p. 89-92.
6. M.
Kohler, W. Preube, B. Gleisberg,
I. Schafer, T. Heinrich, B. Knobus.
2002. Comparison of methods for the analysis of 226Ra in water samples.
Applied Radiation And Isotopes. 56. p. 387-392.
7. www.mde.state.md.us/assets/document/water/radium.pdf
8. eretka J.,
Mathew P.J. 1985.
Natural radioactivity of
Australian building materials.
industrial wastes and byproducts. Health Physics. 48. p. 87-95.
9. Chowdhury
M.I., Alam M.N., Hazari S.K.S. 1999. Distribution of radionuclides in the river
sediments and coastal soils of Chittagaong Bangladesh and evaluation of the
radiation hazard. Applied Radiation And Isotopes 51.p. 747 - 755.
10.
Mohsen Nasirian, Ismail Bahari, Pauzi
Abdullah. Assessment of natural radioactivity in water and sediment from amang
(tin tailing) processing pounds. 2005. Proceeding of the 18 th Malaysian Analytical Chemistry Symposium
SKAM-18. UTM, Johor Bahru, Malaysia. p. 293 -304
11.
Ismail B., Mokhtar M. B., Tan B. H.
1999. Impact of amang processing on the water quality of an immediate water
body: A case of a recycling water system. Sci. Int. 11(1). p. 1 -4.
12.
Ismail Bahari, Redzuwan Yahaya,
Muhamad-Samudi Yasir, Amran Ab. Majid, Lin cheng Lee. 2003. The impact of open
water management system in amang processing on the water quality and 238U and
232Th activity concentration in sediment and water. J. Of Biological Science 3
(11). p. 1063-1069 .
13.
Redzuwan Y.,
Ismail B., Amran,
A. M., Muhammad-Samudi, Y.,
& Lin, C. L. 2002.
The impact of amang processing activity on the water
quality and sediment of an open
water system. Proceeding of 15 th
Analytical chemistry symposium.
Penang Malaysia. p . 11-15.
14.
A. Martin Sanchez, F. Vera Tome, R.
M. Orantos Quintana, V. Gomes Escobar, M. Jurado Vargas. 1995. Gamma and alpha
spectrometry for natural
radioactive nuclides in
the Spa waters
of Extramadua-Spain. J. Of
Environmental Radioactivity. 28 (2). p. 209-220.
15.
Ibeanu I.G.E. 2002. Tin mining and
processing in Nigeria: case for concern. J Of
Environmental Radioactivity. 65(1).
p. 59-66.
16.
I. Bikit, J. Slivka, Lj. Conkic, M.
Krmar, M. Veskovic, N. Zikic-Todorovic, E. Varga, S. Curcic, D. Mrdja. 2005. Radioactivity of
the soil in
Vojvodina (Northern Province
of Serbia and
Montenegro). J. Of
Environmental Radioactivity. 78. p. 11-19.
17.
UNSCEAR. 1989. United Nation
Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Report to the General
assembly with Annexes. New York. United Nations. (online) www.unscear.org
18. B. Ismail,
M. S. Yasir,
Y. Redzuwan, A.
M. Amran. 2003.
Radiological environmental risk
associated with different water
management system in amang processing in Malaysia. Pakistan journal of
biological science 6 (17). p.1544 -1574.
19.
Bondietti. 1974. Adsorption of
U4+ and Th4+ by soil colloids. Agron. Abstr.
20.
Firyal Bou-Rabee. 1996. Soil
radioactivity atlas of Kuwait. Environmental International. 23, No.1. p. 5-15.
21.
NEA -OECD. 1979. Nuclear Energy
Agency. Exposure to radiation from natural radioactivity in building materials.
Report by NEA Group of Experts, OECD. Paris.
22.
UNSCEAR. 1988. United Nation
Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Report to the General
assembly with Annexes. New York. United Nations. (online) www.unscear.org.
23.
Ziqiang P.,
Yin Y., Mingqiang
G. 1988. National
radiation and radioactivity
in China. Radiation
Protection Dosimeter. 24(1/4). P. 29-38.