Sains Malaysiana 38(5)(2009): 735–743

Status Keluarga Malaysia dalam Perspektif Kualiti

(Family Status in Quality Perspective)

P.L. Rika Fatimah*

Program Peningkatan Kualiti & Produktiviti

Pusat Pengajian Sains Matematik, Fakulti Sains & Teknologi

Universiti Kebangsaan Malasyia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor D.E., Malaysia

A. A. Jemain

Program Statistik, Pusat Pengajian Sains Matematik, Fakulti Sains & Teknologi

Universiti Kebangsaan Malasyia  43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor D.E., Malaysia

Diserahkan: 16 Mei 2008 / Diterima: 5 Februari 2009

ABSTRAK

Kebaikan keluarga adalah kebaikan masyarakat dan begitu pun sebaliknya keburukan keluarga akan tercermin dalam masyarakat terkait. Keluarga sebagai satu organisasi merupakan sumber penghasilan modal insan yang berkualiti. Dengan demikian adalah penting untuk sentiasa menambahbaik kualiti keluarga dari piawai tertentu masa ke semasa. Kajian ini bertujuan menyelidiki status kepuasan dan prestasi keluarga masyarakat Malaysia. Usaha ini akan membantu mengenal pasti langkah penambahbaikan yang perlu diberi keutamaan. Untuk menyukat taraf kualiti prestasi keluarga, pendekatan kualiti yang menggunakan beberapa teori kualiti yang terkenal seperti teori kepuasan pelanggan dan prestasi organisasi dimanfaatkan. Kajian ini melibatkan 1,213 sampel responden yang telah berkahwin dan mempunyai anak dan telah dilakukan di Semenanjung Malaysia. Tiga dimensi yang telah dikenal pasti sebagai parameter utama untuk menyukat prestasi keluarga adalah hubungan keluarga, perkembangan keluarga, dan kelestarian keluarga. Hasil kajian menunjukkan kelestarian keluarga (43.2%) memberikan pengaruh yang kuat ke atas wujudnya ketidakpuasan keluarga manakala dimensi perkembangan keluarga (37.3%) memberikan pengaruh yang kuat ke atas keluarga yang tidak berprestasi. Dua pendekatan kualiti digunakan untuk menganalisis pandangan responden bagi menentukan keutamaan penambahbaikan kualiti keluarga.

Kata kunci: Kepuasan keluarga; kepuasan pelanggan; prestasi keluarga; prestasi organisasi

ABSTRACT

The well being of a family, whether its good or bad, is reflected to its society. Family, as an organisation, is a source for producing human capital with certain standard quality. Therefore, it is important to continously improve the quality of family. The aim of this study is to investigate the quality of satisfaction and performance of family life among Malaysians. This effort would help to identify the measures that need to be prioritised for the improvement of family life. To measure the quality of family performance, quality based approaches based on certain well known theory such as customer satisfaction and organisational performance are utilized. Samples involved 1,213 respondents, who are married and have children, are selected from Peninsular Malaysia. Three dimensions that have been identified as important parameters for assessing family performance are family relationship, family development and family sustainability. The result shows that family sustainability (43.2%) has strong influenced to the status of dissatisfaction in family. Furthermore, family development (37.3%) has major influenced towards performance in family. In this study, the two quality based approaches are used to analyse the responses of respondent in determining the priorities for improvement on quality of family.

Keywords: Customer satisfaction; family performance; family satisfaction; organisational performance

RUJUKAN

Azizah, K. 2007. Trans-border mobility in post merdeka Malaysia: A temporary phenomenon? National Population Conference, Demographic Window for Development: Opportunities and Challenges. National Population and Family Development Board (LPPKN) and Ministry of Women, Family, and Community Development. 2-5 July, Kuala Lumpur.

Blair-Loy, M. & Wharton, A.S. 2002. Employees’ use of work-family policies. The University of North Carolina Press Social Forces 80(3): 813-845.

Brown, S.L. 2004. Family structure and child well-being: the significance of parental cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 351-367.

Chakrapani, C. 1998. How to measure service quality & customer Satisfaction. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

Day, G.R. 1993. Quality Function Deployment: linking a company with its customers. Wisconsin: ASQC Quality Press.

Devlin, S., Dong, H.K. & Brown, M. 1993. Selecting a scale for measuring quality. Marketing Research 5: 12-18.

Fennell, G. 1978. Customers’ perceptions of the product-use situation. Journal of Marketing (Apr): 38-47.

Gordon, R.A., Savage, C., Lahey, B.B., Goodman, S.H., Jensen, P.S., Rubio-Stipec, M. & Hoven, C.W. 2003. Family and neighborhood income: Additive and multiplicative associations with youths well-being. Social Science Research 32: 191-219.

Hauser, J.R. 1993. How Puritan Bennet used the house of quality. Sloan Management Review (Spring).

Heene, A. 1997. The nature of strategic planning. Long Range Planning 30(6): 934.

Huston, T.L. & Robins, E. 1982. Conceptual and methodological issues in studying close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family 44: 901-925.

Kohler, H.P., Behrman, J.R. & Skytthe, A. 2004. Partner + children = happiness? An assesment of the effect of fertility and partnerships on subjective well-being. Working paper of University of Pennsylvania, September 19, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Locke, H.J. & Thomes, M.M. 1971. The family: from traditional to companionship. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Looy, B.V., Gemmel, P. & Dierdonck, V.R. 2003. Services management: An integrated approach. Edinburgh Gate: Prentice Hall.

Lovelock, C. 1988. Managing services: Marketing, operations, and human resources. London: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.

Miller, T. 2002. Associations between marital quality and parenting: does marital quality affect the degree to which parents encourage autonomy in their children? McNair Journal.

Stevens, D.P., Kiger, G. & Riley, P.J. 2006. His, hers, or ours? Work-to-family spillover, crossover, and family cohesion. The Social Science Journal 43: 425-436.

Straker, D. 1995. A Toolbox for quality improvement and problem solving. UK Limited: Prentice Hall International.

Tague, N.R. 1995. The quality toolbox. US: Synergy Books International.

Thornton, A. 2001. The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography 38(4): 449-465.

Voydanoff, P. 2004. The effects of work demands and resources on Work-to-Family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 398-412.

*Penulis untuk surat-menyurat; email: rika_paper@yahoo.com