Sains Malaysiana 42(5)(2013): 667–672
Penglibatan
Panel Penilai dengan Kewibawaan Berbeza dalam Mengagregat Nilai Subjektif Asas
Pangkat
(Involvement of Panel of Evaluators with
Different Credibility in Aggregating Subjective Rank-based Values)
Maznah Mat Kasim*
Pusat Pengajian Sains
Kuantitatif, Kolej Sastera dan Sains UUM
06010, UUM Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Abdul Aziz Jemain
Pusat Pengajian Sains
Matematik, Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi
Universiti Kebangsaan
Malaysia, 43600 Bangi Selangor, Malaysia
Diserahkan: 3 April 2012/Diterima:
17 September 2012
ABSTRAK
Keputusan terakhir yang dicari dalam
menyelesaikan masalah berbilang kriteria ialah satu pangkat kedudukan unit yang
dianalisis berdasarkan prestasi keseluruhan unit-unit tersebut. Satu cara untuk mendapatkan
prestasi keseluruhan setiap unit adalah dengan menggabungkan prestasi dan
wajaran kriteria masing-masing melalui pelbagai kaedah pengagregatan. Kajian tertumpu kepada penerapan tiga kaedah asas pangkat dalam
menilai kepentingan kriteria yang melibatkan satu panel penilai dengan
kewibawaan berbeza. Hanya dua pendekatan
pengagregatan berasaskan kaedah pemurataan tertib berpemberat sesuai
diutarakan agar hasil akhir boleh dicapai. Setiap
pendekatan pengagregatan yang dicadangkan diringi dengan contoh pengiraan.
Kata kunci: Kewibawaan; masalah berbilang
kriteria; pangkat; pengagregatan; wajaran
ABSTRACT
The final goal in solving multi-criteria
problems is a ranking of the analyzed units based on their overall performance.
One way to obtain the overall performance of each unit is by combining its
performances and weights of criteria through various aggregation methods. This
research focused on the application of three rank-based methods to evaluate the
relative importance of criteria which involved one
panel evaluators with different credibilitity. There are only two suitable
aggregation approaches based on ordered weighted average method are proposed in
order to achieve the final result. Every approach proposed is followed by a
numerical example.
Keywords: Aggregation; credibility; multi-criteria
problem; rank; weights
RUJUKAN
Barron, F.H. & Barrett,
B.E. 1996. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management
Science 429(11): 1515-1523.
Filev, D. & Yager, R.R.
1998. On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights. Fuzzy
Sets and Systems 94: 157-169.
Ma, J., Fan, Z. & Huang, L. 1999. A subjective and objective integrated approach
to determine attribute weights. European Journal of Operational
Research 112: 397-404.
Maznah Mat Kasim &
Abdul Aziz Jemain. 2012. Penglibatan panel penilai dalam mengagregat nilai
subjektif asas pangkat dalam menyelesaikan masalah berbilang kriteria. Sains
Malaysiana 41(3): 353-360.
Opricovic, S. & Tzeng,
G.H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR
and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 156(2): 445- 455.
Roberts, R. & Goodwin,
P. 2002. Weight approximation in multi-attribute decision models. Journal of
Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 11: 291-303.
Yager,
R.R. 1988. On ordered weighted
averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision
making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 8:
183-190.
Yager,
R.R. 1996. Quantifiers guided
aggregation under OWA operators. International Journal of
Intelligence Systems 11: 49-73.
*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email:
maznah@uum.edu.my