Sains Malaysiana 43(5)(2014): 649–654
Effect
of Acute Stevia Consumption on Blood Glucose Response in Healthy Malay Young Adults
(Kesan Pengambilan Stevia Akut ke atas Tindak Balas Glukosa Darah dalam Kalangan Orang Melayu Dewasa yang
Sihat)
NORAZLANSHAH HAZALI*1, AZIZAH
MOHAMED1, MUHAMMAD
IBRAHIM1, MASHITA
MASRI1, KHAIRIL
ANUAR
MD
ISA2, NORAZMIR
MD
NOR2, MOHD
KHAN
AYOB3& FAZLYLA NADYA MOHD
FADZLAN1
1Department of Nutrition Sciences, Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences,
International Islamic University Malaysia, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang,
Malaysia
2Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA,
Puncak Alam Campus
42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, D.E. Malaysia
3School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Department of Food
Science, Faculty of
Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600
Bangi, Selangor, D.E. Malaysia
Diserahkan: 6 Disember 2012/Diterima: 31 Julai 2013
ABSTRACT
Previously, researchers had initiated investigation to find an
alternative drug that can treat diabetes mellitus without dragging patients
into more complicated health problems. After many studies, they found a new and
high potential plant-based drug named stevia that is able to reduce diabetic
patients’ blood glucose. This study aimed to determine the effect of stevia on
blood glucose of healthy subjects. The study was carried out by comparing the
glycemic response between sucrose and stevia (500 and 1000 mg) among 32
subjects aged between 18 and 23 years old. Subjects were required to fast 8 to
10 h prior to each test which was done on different days. Finger prick test
were done on 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min to construct a blood sugar response
curve for 2 h period. There is a significant difference between the glycemic
response of sucrose and stevia 500 mg. Sucrose significantly increased the post
prandial blood glucose while stevia 500 mg reduced blood glucose after 30 min
of consumption. Sucrose also produced higher glycemic response at min-30 when
compared with stevia 1000 mg. There is no significant difference between the
glycemic response of stevia of different dose, 500 and 1000 mg. No
dose-dependent effect was observed in this study. In conclusion, stevia does
not raise blood glucose significantly when consumed in short period. Stevia is
effective to be used by healthy people to maintain blood glucose even when
consumed in short length of time.
Keywords: Glycemic response; natural sweetener;
stevia rebaudiana
ABSTRAK
Sebelum ini, para penyelidik telah menjalankan
kajian bagi mencari ubat alternatif yang mampu merawat diabetes melitus tanpa
menyebabkan masalah kesihatan yang lebih rumit dalam kalangan pesakit. Kajian ini dijalankan
bertujuan untuk menentukan kesan stevia ke
atas kandungan glukosa dalam darah subjek sihat. Kajian ini telah
dijalankan dengan membandingkan tindak balas glisemik antara sukrosa dengan stevia (500 dan 1000 mg) dalam kalangan 32
subjek berumur 18 hingga 23 tahun. Subjek dikehendaki berpuasa 8 hingga 10 jam
sebelum setiap ujian dijalankan. Ujian cucuk jari telah
dijalankan pada min 0, 30, 60, 90 dan 120 untuk membina lengkuk tindak balas
gula dalam darah dalam tempoh dua jam. Terdapat perbezaan yang bererti
antara tindak balas glisemik dengan stevia 500 mg. Sukrosa meningkatkan
glukosa darah pos prandial secara signifikan sementara stevia 500 mg
menurunkan glukosa darah selepas 30 min pengambilan. Sukrosa juga menghasilkan
tindak balas glisemik pada min ke 30 berbanding stevia 1000 mg. Tiada
perbezaan yang signifikan antara tindak balas glisemik stevia yang
berlainan dos, 500 dan 1000 mg. Tiada kesan kebergantungan kepada dos
diperhatikan dalam kajian ini. Kesimpulannya, stevia tidak meningkatkan glukosa darah dengan
signifikan apabila diambil dalam tempoh masa yang singkat.Stevia adalah efektif untuk digunakan oleh individu sihat yang
mahu mengawal glukosa darah walaupun diambil dalam tempoh masa yang singkat.
Kata kunci: Pemanis semula jadi; stevia rebaudiana; tindak balas glisemik
RUJUKAN
American Diabetes
Association. 2011. Diabetes statistics.
http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics. Accessed on 24
January.
Anton, S.D., Martin, C.K.,
Han, H., Coulan, S., Cefalu, W.T., Geiselman, P. & Williamson, D.A. 2010. Effects of stevia, aspartame,
and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin
levels. Appetite 55(1): 37-43.
Barriocanal, L.A.,
Palacios, M., Benitez, G., Benitez, S., Jimenez, J.T., Jimenez, N. & Rojas,
V. 2008. Apparent lack of
pharmacological effect of steviol glycosides used as sweeteners in humans. A pilot study of repeated exposures in some normotensive and
hypotensive individuals and in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics. Regul.
Toxicol. Pharm. 51: 37-41.
Brouns, F., Bjorck, I., Frayn, K.N., Gibbs,
A.L., Lang, V., Slama, G. & Wolever, T.M. 2005. Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr.
Res. Rev. 18: 145-171.
Chan, P., Tomlinson, B.,
Chen, Y.J., Liu, J.C., Hsieh, M.H. & Cheng, J.T. 2000. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the
effectiveness and tolerability of oral stevioside in human hypertension. Br.
J. Clin. Pharmacol. 50(3): 215-220.
Chatsudthipong, V. & Muanprasat, C. 2009.
Stevioside and related compounds: therapeutic benefits beyond sweetness. Pharmacology
and Therapeutics 121: 41-54.
Elkins, R. 1997. Stevia. Natures Sweetener. New York: Woodland Publication.
Geuns, J.M. 2003. Stevia. Phytochemistry 64(5):
913-921.
Geuns, J.M.C., Buyse, J., Vankeirsbilck, A.
& Temme, E.H. 2007. Metabolism of stevioside by healthy
subjects. Exp. Biol. Med. 232(1): 164-173.
Hull, J.S. 2002. Saccharin.
http://www.sweetpoison.com/ aspartame-sweeteners.html. Accessed on 24 January.
Mahan, L. & Escott-Stump, S. 2008. Krause's
Food and Nutrition Therapy. 12th ed. Missouri: Elsevier Inc.
Malaysian Diabetes
Association. 2008. Watch those sugar
levels. http://www.diabetes.org.my/article.php?aid=426. Accessed on 24 February
2011.
National Diabetes
Information Clearinghouse. 2011. National Diabetes Statistics. http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/DM/PUBS/
statistics/#ddY20. Accessed on 24 January.
Savita, S.M., Sheela, K., Sunanda, S., Shankar,
A.G. & Parama, R. 2004. Stevia rebaudiana –
a functional component for food industry. J. Hum. Ecol. 15(4):
261-264.
Suzana, S., Rafidah, G., Noor Aini, M.Y., Nik
Shanita, S., Zahara, A.M. & Shahrul Azman, M.N. 2009. Atlas
of Food Exchanges and Portion Sizes. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: MDC
Publishers.
Wolever, T.M.S. 2004. Effect
of blood sampling schedule and method of calculating the area under the curve
on validity and precision of glycaemic index values. Br. J. Nutr. 91:
295-300.
Zainal Ariffin, O. 2013. Healthy lifestyle
programmes and other government efforts in combating NCDs in Malaysia. Paper work on NSM NCD Conference 2013. Organised by
Nutrition Society Malaysia (NSM). Kuala Lumpur, 26-27 March.
*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email: norazlanshah@iium.edu.my
|