Sains Malaysiana 47(8)(2018): 1835–1842
http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2018-4708-23
Perubahan Tahap Pencahayaan dalam Bilik Darjah
di Sebuah Sekolah Pendidikan Khas Cacat Penglihatan dan Perbandingan
Tahap Pencahayaan di bawah Keadaan Pencahayaan yang Berbeza
(Change in Level of Classroom Lighting at a
Special Education School Distortion of Vision
and Comparison of Lighting at Different Lighting
Conditions)
WAN NUR
' AMIRAH
IBRAHIM1,
ZAINORA
MOHAMMED2*,
NORLIZA
MOHAMAD
FADZIL2,
SUMITHIRA
NARAYANASAMY3
& MOHD 'IZZUDDIN HAIROL3
1Program Optometri dan
Sains Penglihatan, Fakulti Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan
Raja Muda Abdul Aziz,, 50300 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia
2Program Optometri dan
Sains Penglihatan, Pusat Rehabilitasi dan Keperluan Khas,
Fakulti Sains Kesihatan,
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300 Kuala Lumpur,
Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia
3Program Optometri dan
Sains Penglihatan, Pusat Kesihatan Komuniti, Fakulti Sains Kesihatan, Universiti
Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300 Kuala Lumpur,
Wilayah
Persekutuan, Malaysia
Diserahkan: 28 April
2017/Diterima: 13 Mac 2018
ABSTRACT
Illumination is one of the important
physical aspects that influences comfortability during learning session
particularly among visually impaired students. The purpose of this study was to
determine changes in illumination level in classrooms during learning session
at Sekolah Menengah Pendidikan Khas (SMPK), Setapak. The second
objective was to compare the illumination level in the classrooms under three
different lighting conditions: daylight only, with additional artificial light
and with removal of obstructions to daylight. Illumination levels in 17
classrooms was measured at one hour interval, between 8 am to 1 pm for the
first stage and 19 classrooms under three different lighting conditions from 11
am to 12 noon for the second stage, using ILM1335
(ISO-TECH,
Taiwan) digital luxmeter. Illumination level increased significantly from 8 am
to 11 am (One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA: F(2.14, 34.26)=76.49, p<0
.001) and was maximum at 1 pm. The illumination level was highest for the
condition of daylight with additional artificial light (One-Way Repeated
Measures ANOVA: F(2,34)=110.51, p<0.001) compared to
other conditions. Illumination levels for daylight without obstruction was
significantly higher than daylight only (pairwise comparison: p=0.001).
Classroom illumination level was lowest in the early morning. However, classroom
illumination can be increased either by removing the obstructions to daylight
or with additional artificial lighting.
Keywords: Artificial lighting;
classroom; daylighting; illumination
ABSTRAK
Pencahayaan adalah salah satu aspek
fizikal penting mempengaruhi keselesaan semasa sesi pembelajaran terutamanya
dalam kalangan murid penglihatan terhad. Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan
perubahan tahap pencahayaan dalam bilik darjah semasa sesi pembelajaran di
Sekolah Menengah Pendidikan Khas (SMPK), Setapak. Tujuan kedua
adalah membandingkan tahap pencahayaan dalam bilik darjah untuk tiga keadaan
cahaya berbeza iaitu di bawah cahaya cerah sahaja dengan tambahan cahaya buatan
dan dengan menyingkir halangan terhadap cahaya cerah. Tahap pencahayaan diukur dalam
17 buah bilik darjah untuk sela satu jam antara jam 8 pagi hingga 1 petang
untuk peringkat pertama dan 19 buah bilik darjah dalam tiga keadaan cahaya
berbeza antara jam 11 pagi hingga 12 tengah hari untuk peringkat kedua pada
sembilan kawasan yang sama menggunakan luxmeter digital ILM1335
(ISO-TECH,
Taiwan). Tahap pencahayaan meningkat dengan signifikan dari jam 8 hingga 11
pagi (ANOVA sehala pengukuran berulang: F(2.14, 34.26)=76.49, p<0.001)
dan mencapai tahap maksimum pada jam 1 petang. Tahap pencahayaan adalah
tertinggi diperoleh pada keadaan cahaya cerah dengan tambahan cahaya buatan (ANOVA sehala pengukuran berulang: F(2,34)=110.51, p<0.001)
berbanding dua keadaan lain. Tahap pencahayaan pada keadaan cahaya cerah tanpa
halangan juga lebih tinggi secara signifikan berbanding cahaya cerah sahaja
(perbandingan pasangan demi pasangan: p=0.001). Tahap pencahayaan bilik
darjah adalah paling rendah pada waktu pagi. Namun, pencahayaan boleh
dipertingkatkan melalui dua kaedah iaitu dengan menyingkir halangan kepada
cahaya cerah atau dengan tambahan cahaya buatan.
Kata
kunci: Bilik darjah; cahaya buatan; cahaya cerah; pencahayaan
RUJUKAN
Bowers, A.R., Meek, C.
& Stewart, N. 2001. Illumination and reading performance in age related
macular degeneration. Clinical & Experimental Optometry: Journal of the
Australian Optometrical Association 84(3): 139-147.
Boyce, P. & Raynham,
P. 2009. The SLL Lighting Handbook, edited by Boreham, S. & Hadley,
P. London: Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.
Colenbrander, A. 1994.
The basic low vision exam. In Vision Rehabilitation Issue of the
Ophthalmology Clinics of North America. hlm.151-162.
Cornelissen, F.W.,
Bootsma, A. & Kooijman, A.C. 1995. Object perception by visually impaired
people at different light levels. Vision Res. 35(1): 161-168.
Degro, J. 2007.
Experimenting with a luxmeter and exploring illuminance. In Physics
Teachers’Invention Fair (12). Prague. hlm.1-5.
Dickinson, C. 1998. Low
Vision Principles and Practice. Woburn: Reed Educational and Professional
Publishing Ltd. European Committee for Standardization. 2002. Light and
lighting - Lighting of work places - Part 1 : Indoor work. (EN12464-1).
Farzam, R. 2011.
Measurements and analysis of day lighting condition of schools in Iran. Kertas
kerja 5th Symposium on Advances in Science & Technology. Mashhad,
Iran, 12-17 Mei.
Galasiu, A.D. &
Veitch, J.A. 2006. Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous
environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy
and Buildings 38(7): 728-742.
Glover, S., Kelly, M.,
Wozniak, H. & Moss, N. 1999. The effect of room illumination on visual
acuity measurement. Australian Orthoptic Journal 34: 3-8.
Hae, Y.K., In, H.P.
& Mi, J.K. 2003. The role of vision screening and classroom illumination in
the vision health of Korean school children. Journal of School Health 73(9):
358-362.
Hathaway, W.E. 1995.
Effects of school lighting on physical development and school performance. The
Journal of Educational Research 88(4): 228-242.
Iwata, T., Hatao, A.,
Shukuya, M. & Kimura, K. 1994. Visual comfort in the daylit luminous
environment: Structural model for evaluation. Lighting Research and
Technology 26(2): 91-97.
Jabatan Standard
Malaysia. 2014a. Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy for
Non-residential Buildings - Code of Practice (Second Revision). (MS
1525:2014).
Jabatan Standard
Malaysia. 2014b. Universal Design and Accessibility in the Built Environment
-Code of Practice (2nd Revision) 1184:2014.
Johnson, C.A. & Casson,
E.J. 1995. Effects of luminance, contrast, and blur on visual acuity. Optometry
and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry 72(12):
864-869.
Kim, W. & Koga, Y.
2005. Glare constant Gw for the evaluation of discomfort glare from windows. Solar
Energy 78(1): 105-111.
Lindner, H., Hubmer, K.,
Schlote, H.W. & Rohl, F. 1989. Subjective lighting needs of the old and the
pathological eye. Lighting Research and Technology 21(1): 1-10.
Mark, W. & Arnold,
W. 2009. Lighting and discomfort in the classroom. Journal of Environmental
Psychology 29(1): 63-75.
Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin,
Hasnah Toran, Mohd Mokhtar Tahar, Safani Bari, Siti Nur Nadirah Ibrahim &
Rozniza Zaharudin. 2013. Bilik darjah pendidikan khas pada masa kini dan kekangannya
terhadap proses pengajaran. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education 28:
159-171.
Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yassin,
Hasnah Toran, Mohd Mokhtar Tahar, Noraini Mohd Salleh & Rabaishah Azirun.
2011. Tinjauan terhadap tahap kesesuaian infrastruktur Program Integrasi
Pendidikan Khas Bermasalah Pembelajaran. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators
and Education 26(1): 159-171.
Najafabadi, F.A. 2015.
An investigation on natural lighting levels in students' dormitories
at EMU in Famagusta , North Cyprus. Kertas kerja The Annual International
Civil, Architecture and Urbanism Conference (ICAUC 2015). Anjuran
Kharazmi Higher Institute of Science & Technology. Shiraz, Iran,
22 September.
Negiloni, K., Ramani,
K.K. & Sudhir, R.R. 2017. Do school classrooms meet the visual requirements
of children and recommended vision standards? Plos One 12(4): 1-10.
Osterhaus, W.K.E. 2005.
Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office
environments. Solar Energy 79(2): 140-158.
Panduan Teknik Reka
Bentuk Elektrik.
2011. Edisi ke-4. Kuala Lumpur: Cawangan Kejuruteraan Elektrik Ibu Pejabat JKR
Malaysia.
Sojoudi, S. &
Jaafar, M.F.Z. 2012. Indoor lighting of the classes and its effects. 6thSASTech
2012, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. hlm.1-8.
Winterbottom, M. &
Wilkins, A.J. 2009. Lighting and discomfort in the classroom. Journal of
Environmental Psychology 29(1): 63-75.
Wu, W. & Ng, E.
2003. A review of the development of daylighting in schools. Lighting
Research and Technology 35(2): 111-125.
Zakaria, S.A. & Ismail,
A. 2012. Impak cahaya dan pencahayaan terhadap keselamatan warga
di sekolah. Malaysian Education Dean's Council Journal 10:
64-78.
*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email: zainora@ukm.edu.my
|