 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sains
Malaysiana 50(11)(2021): 3421-3438
http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2021-5011-25
Efficiency of Higher Education in the
Presence of Shared Inputs using Data Envelopment Analysis
(Kecekapan Pendidikan Tinggi dengan Perkongsian
Input menggunakan Analisis Penyampulan Data)
MICHAEL GIDEY GEBRU1,2*,
SAQLAIN RAZA1 & MANSOOR SHAUKAT KHAN1
1Department of Mathematics,
COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan
2Department of Mathematics,
Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia
Diserahkan: 26 November 2020/Diterima:
13 Mac 2021
ABSTRACT
This study measures the efficiency of higher
education institutions with respect to teaching activity, research activity,
and overall activities and also provides a direction for low-performing
institutions to improve their performance. In many instances, the efficiency of the institution is a sum up of the
efficiency of its activities. However, when the activities consume some
resources in common, it
requires the allocation of shared resources among the activities. Since sums up
the efficiency of each activity does not give the institution's overall
efficiency, we use
a joint data envelopment analysis that takes into account the institution's internal operations to measure the teaching efficiency, research efficiency, and overall efficiency
of the institutions. The empirical results indicate that the institutions that execute
both activities simultaneously become more productive rather than
adopt a single activity. Hence, this study suggests a useful and measurable action to
improve the institution’s performance.
Keywords: Data envelopment
analysis; efficiency; higher educations; shared inputs
ABSTRAK
Kajian
ini mengukur kecekapan institusi pengajian tinggi dengan melihat kepada
aktiviti pengajaran, aktiviti penyelidikan dan keseluruhan aktiviti serta
memberikan panduan kepada institusi berprestasi rendah untuk meningkatkan
prestasi mereka. Dalam banyak keadaan, kecekapan institusi diukur dengan jumlah
kecekapan aktivitinya. Walau bagaimanapun, apabila aktiviti ini menggunakan
beberapa sumber yang sama, ia memerlukan peruntukan pengagihan sumber antara
aktiviti tersebut. Oleh kerana jumlah kecekapan setiap aktiviti tidak
memberikan kecekapan keseluruhan institusi, kami menggunakan analisis
penyampulan data yang mempertimbangkan operasi dalaman institusi untuk mengukur
kecekapan pengajaran, kecekapan penyelidikan serta kecekapan keseluruhan
institusi. Hasil empirik menunjukkan bahawa institusi yang menjalankan kedua-dua
aktiviti tersebut secara serentak menjadi lebih produktif daripada yang
menjalankan satu aktiviti. Maka, kajian ini mencadangkan tindakan yang berguna
dan dapat diukur untuk meningkatkan prestasi institusi.
Kata kunci: Analisis penyampulan data; input
dikongsi; kecekapan; pengajian tinggi
RUJUKAN
Abbott, M. & Doucouliagos, C. 2003. The efficiency of
Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis. Economics of
Education Review 22(1):
89-97.
Afonso, A. & Aubyn, M.S. 2006.
Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semi-parametric
analysis with non-discretionary inputs. Economic Modelling 23(3): 476-491.
Agasisti, T. 2014. The
efficiency of public spending on education: An empirical comparison of EU
countries. European Journal of Education 49(4): 543-557.
Aviles-Sacoto
S. 2012. A restricted multiplier DEA model for identifying best practices for attracting students into a Mexican university - case study:
School of Business at ITESM, Master's thesis, (ITESM) (Technological and Higher Education Institute of Monterrey, Mexico) (Unpublished).
Avkiran, N.K. 2011. Applications of data envelopment analysis
in the service sector. In Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis.
Boston: Springer. pp. 403-443.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. 1984. Some
models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment
analysis. Management Science 30(9): 1078-1092.
Beasley, J.E. 1995.
Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the
Operational Research Society 46(4):
441-452.
Boulton, G. & Lucas, C. 2011. What
are universities for? Chinese Science Bulletin 56(23): 2506-2517.
Bradley, S., Johnes, G. & Millington, J. 2001. The effect
of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England. European
Journal of Operational Research 135(3):
545-568.
Castano, M.C.N. & Cabanda, E.C.
2007. Performance evaluation of the efficiency of Philippine
Private Higher Educational Institutions: Application of frontier
approaches. International Transactions in Operational Research 14(5): 431-444.
Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. 1962. Programming with linear
fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 9(4): 181-186.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.
& Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European
Journal of Operational Research 2(6):
429-444.
Chen, J.K. & Chen, I.S. 2011.
Inno-Qual efficiency of higher education: Empirical testing using data
envelopment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 38(3): 1823-1834.
Cook, W.D., Tone, K. & Zhu, J. 2014. Data envelopment
analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega 44: 1-4.
Dufrechou, P.A. 2016. The efficiency of public education
spending in Latin America: A comparison to high-income countries. International
Journal of Educational Development 49: 188-203.
Elbanna, S. & Abdel-Maksoud, A.
2020. Organizational resources and performance: The case of an
oil-rich country. Public Performance & Management Review 43(3): 713-739.
Farrell, M.J. 1957. The
measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society: Series A (General) 120(3):
253-281.
Fromhold-Eisebith, M. & Werker,
C. 2013. Universities’ functions in knowledge transfer: A
geographical perspective. The Annals of Regional Science 51(3): 621-643.
Gupta, S., Verhoeven, M. & Tiongson, E.R. 2002. The
effectiveness of government spending on education and health care in developing
and transition economies. European Journal of Political Economy 18(4): 717-737.
Hall, P. 1986. On the number of bootstrap simulations
required to construct a confidence interval. The Annals of Statistics 14(4): 1453-1462.
Hanushek, E.A. & Woessmann, L. 2008. The role of cognitive skills in economic
development. Journal of Economic Literature 46(3): 607-668.
Hanushek, E.A.
& Luque, J.A. 2003. Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics
of Education Review 22(5):
481-502.
Herbst, M. 2007. Financing public universities. Higher
Education Dynamics 18(1):
90-94.
Johnes, J. 2006. Measuring teaching efficiency in higher
education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates
from UK Universities 1993. European Journal of Operational Research 174(1): 443-456.
Johnes, J. & Li, Y.U. 2008. Measuring the research
performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment
analysis. China Economic Review 19(4): 679-696.
Joumady, O. & Ris, C. 2005.
Performance in European higher education: A non‐parametric production
frontier approach. Education Economics 13(2): 189-205.
Kirjavainen, T. & Loikkanent,
H.A. 1998. Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools:
An application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review 17(4): 377-394.
Kong, W.H. & Fu, T.T. 2012.
Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment
analysis and student based value-added performance indicators. Omega 40(5): 541-549.
Lall, V. & Teyarachakul, S. 2006.
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system selection: A data envelopment
analysis (DEA) approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems 47(1): 123-127.
Lang, D.W. & Zha, Q. 2004.
Comparing universities: A case study between Canada and China. Higher
Education Policy 17(4): 339-354.
Lee, B.L. & Worthington, A.C. 2016. A network DEA
quantity and quality-orientated production model: An application to Australian
university research services. Omega 60: 26-33.
Leithwood, K. & Menzies, T. 1998. Forms
and effects of school-based management: A review. Educational Policy 12(3):
325-346.
Liefner, I. 2003.
Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education
systems. Higher Education 46(4): 469-489.
Liu, J.S., Lu, L.Y., Lu, W.M. & Lin, B.J. 2013. A survey
of DEA applications. Omega 41(5): 893-902.
Mancebon, M.J. & Molinero, C.M.
2000. Performance in primary schools. Journal of the
Operational Research Society 51(7): 843-854.
Molinero, C.M. 1996. On the joint determination of
efficiencies in a data envelopment analysis context. Journal of the
Operational Research Society 47(10): 1273-1279.
Moncayo-Martínez, L.A.,
Ramírez-Nafarrate, A. & Hernández-Balderrama, M.G. 2020. Evaluation of
public HEI on teaching, research, and knowledge dissemination by data
envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 69:
100-115.
Nazarko, J. & Saparauskas, J.
2014. Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of
public higher education institutions. Technological and Economic
Development of Economy 20(1): 25-44.
Ramzi, S. & Ayadi, M. 2016. Assessment of universities
efficiency using data envelopment analysis: Weights restrictions and
super-efficiency measure. Journal of Applied Management and Investments 5(1):
40-58.
Sagarra, M.,
Mar-Molinero, C. & Agasisti, T. 2017. Exploring the efficiency of Mexican
universities: Integrating data envelopment analysis and multidimensional
scaling. Omega 67: 123-133.
Shimshak, D.G. & Wagner, J.M. 2012. Efficiency in public higher
education systems: A statewide comparison using data envelopment analysis, In Applications
of Management Science. Vol. 15,
edited by Lawrence, K.D. & Kleinman, G. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. pp. 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1108.
Simar, L. &
Wilson, P.W. 1998. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap
in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science 44(1):
49-61.
Taylor, B. & Harris, G. 2004. Relative efficiency among
South African universities: A data envelopment analysis. Higher
Education 47(1): 73-89.
Wai, C.C. & Seng, E.L.K. 2014.
Exploring the effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning tools in a
school of business. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences 123:
470-476.
Zhou, C. & Wang, M. 2009. The
evaluation research on higher education efficiency with data envelopment
analysis (DEA). 2009 International Conference on Management and Service
Science. IEEE. pp. 1-7.
Zoghbi, A.C., Rocha, F.
& Mattos, E. 2013. Education production efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian
universities. Economic Modelling 31: 94-103.
*Pengarang
untuk surat-menyurat; email: gidey.michael7@gmail.com
|
|||
|
