Sains Malaysiana 50(4)(2021): 1143-1156
http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2021-5004-24
Oil Price
Shocks and Energy Stock Returns of ASEAN-5 Countries: Evidence from Ready’s
(2018) Decomposition Technique in a Markov Regime Switching Framework
(Kejutan Harga Minyak dan Pulangan Stok Tenaga Negara-Negara ASEAN-5: Pembuktian daripada Teknik Penguraian Ready (2018) dalam Kerangka Peralihan Rejim Markov)
ADILAH AZHARI1,
MUKHRIZ IZRAF AZMAN AZIZ1, YONG KANG CHEAH1 & HAZRUL
SHAHIRI2*
1Department
of Economics and Agribusiness, School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok,
Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia
2Centre
of Inclusive and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600
UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Diserahkan:
21 Mei 2020/Diterima: 8 September 2020
ABSTRACT
The present study applies a new
decomposition technique by Ready (2018) to estimate the impact of oil price
shocks on stock return in a Markov Regime Switching framework. The approach
solves certain shortcomings of the novel procedure from Kilian by incorporating daily forward-looking prices of traded
financial asset. The regime switching regression provides the evidence of
strong nonlinear association of stock returns to risk shocks and demand shocks
despite the absence of strong regime effects. We also demonstrate that positive
demand shocks increase stock returns, whereas positive risk shocks negatively
impact stock returns. For supply shocks, findings show that oil supply shocks
do not significantly impact stock returns for Malaysia and Singapore. For
Indonesia, supply shocks have a significant positive effect only in high
volatility state. In the case of Thailand and The Philippines, the effects of
supply shocks are negative and significant in high volatility state; but are
not significant in low volatility state. Overall, our results suggest that
demand shock has a greater economic impact than supply and risk shocks as
demonstrated previously by Kilian and Park and Ready.
Keywords: Asymmetric; crude oil price; Markov switching;
stock return
ABSTRAK
Kajian ini menggunakan teknik baru nyahkomposisi yang dibangunkan oleh Ready untuk menganggar kesan kejutan harga minyak kepada pulangan saham dalam Model Peralihan Rejim Markov. Pendekatan ini berupaya menyelesaikan beberapa kekurangan dalam prosedur terdahulu oleh Kilian dengan mengambil kira harga masa depan harian aset kewangan yang diniagakan. Regresi peralihan rejim menunjukkan bukti tentang kewujudan hubungan yang kuat antara pulangan saham dengan kejutan risiko dan permintaan walaupun tanpa penglibatan kesan rejim yang kuat. Kajian ini juga memaparkan kejutan permintaan yang positif memberi peningkatan pulangan saham manakala kejutan risiko yang positif memberi kesan buruk kepada pulangan saham. Bagi kejutan penawaran pula, keputusan menunjukkan kejutan penawaran minyak tidak mempunyai kesan yang signifikan kepada pulangan saham di Malaysia dan Singapura. Bagi Indonesia, kejutan penawaran mempunyai kesan positif yang signifikan hanya dalam keadaan apungan yang tinggi. Bagi Thailand dan Filipina, kesan kejutan penawaran adalah negatif dan signifikan dalam keadaan apungan yang tinggi tetapi tidak signifikan dalam keadaan apungan rendah. Secara keseluruhan, keputusan telah mencadangkan kejutan permintaan mempunyai impak ekonomi yang lebih besar daripada kejutan penawaran dan risiko seperti ditunjukkan oleh Kilian dan Park dan Ready.
Kata kunci: Harga minyak mentah; maklumat tak simetri; peralihan Markov; pulangan saham
RUJUKAN
Adaramola, A.A.
2012. Oil price shocks and stock market behaviour:
The Nigerian experience. Journal of
Economics 3(1): 19-24.
Aloui, C., Nguyen, D.K.
& Njeh, H. 2012. Assessing the impacts of oil price fluctuations on stock returns in
emerging markets. Economic Modelling 29(6): 2686-2695.
Arouri, M.E.H., Lahiani, A. & Nguyen, D.K. 2011. Return and volatility transmission between
world oil prices and stock markets of the GCC countries. Economic Modelling 28(4): 1815-1825.
Awartani, B. & Maghyereh,
A.I. 2013. Dynamic spillovers between oil and stock markets in the Gulf
Cooperation Council countries. Energy Economics 36:
28-42.
Badeeb, R.A. & Hooi, H.L. 2018. Asymmetric impact of oil price on Islamic
sectoral stocks. Energy Economics 71:
128-139.
Bakri, A. & Abdul-Rahman, A. 2020. Market integration in
Asean-5: Evidence of Islamic and conventional stock markets. Polish Journal of Management Studies 21(1): 186-198.
Banerjee,
P.S., Doran, J.S. & Peterson, D. 2007. Implied volatility and future portfolio
returns. Journal of Banking & Finance 31(10): 3183-3199.
Basher, S.A., Haug, A.A. & Sadorsky, P. 2012. Oil prices, exchange rates and emerging stock markets. Energy
Economics 34(1): 227-240.
Basher,
S.A., Haug, A.A. & Sadorsky,
P. 2018. The impact of oil-market shocks on stock returns in major
oil-exporting countries. Journal of
International Money and Finance 86: 264-280.
Basnet, H.C. & Upadhyaya, K. 2015. Impact of oil price shocks on output,
inflation and the real exchange rate: Evidence from
selected ASEAN countries. Applied Economics 47(29): 3078-3091.
Bollerslev, T., Tauchen, G. & Zhou, H. 2009. Expected stock returns and
variance risk premia. Review of Financial Studies 22: 4463-4492.
Bouri, E. 2015. Return and
volatility linkages between oil prices and the Lebanese stock market in crisis
periods. Energy 89: 365-371.
Bouri, E., Awartani, B. & Maghyereh,
A. 2016. Crude oil prices and
sectoral stock returns in Jordan around the Arab uprisings of 2010. Energy
Economics 56: 205-214.
Broadstock, D.C., Cao, H. & Zhang, D. 2012. Oil shocks and their impact on energy related stocks in China. Energy
Economics 34(6): 1888-1895.
Broadstock, D.C., Wang, R. & Zhang, D. 2014. Direct and indirect oil shocks and their impacts upon energy related stocks. Economic
Systems 38(3): 451-467.
Brock, W.A., Dechert, W.D., Scheinkman, J.A. & LeBaron, B. 1996. A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econometric Reviews 15: 197-235.
Cunado, J. & Gracia, F. 2014. Oil price shocks and stock market returns:
Evidence for some European countries. Energy Economics 42: 365-377.
Darinda, D.
& Permana, F. 2019. Volatility spillover effects
in Asean-5 stock market: Does the different oil price era change the pattern? Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan 3(2): 116-134.
Demirer, F., Roman, F. & Shahzad, S.J.H. 2019. Oil price shocks and
financial markets: A comparative analysis of stock and sovereign bond markets
(Unpublished).
Ding, H.,
Hyung, K. & Sung, P. 2016. Crude oil and stock markets: Causal
relationships in tails? Energy Economics 59: 58-69.
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. & Stock, J. 1996. Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4): 813-836.
Elyasiani, E., Mansur, I. & Odusami, B. 2011. Oil price shocks and industry stock returns. Energy Economics 33(5): 966-974.
Granger,
C.W. 1996. Can we improve the perceived quality of economic forecasts? Journal of Applied Econometrics 11(5): 455-473.
Ghosh, S.
& Kanjilal, K. 2016. Co-movement of international
crude oil price and Indian stock market: Evidences from nonlinear cointegration
tests. Energy Economics 53: 111-117.
Gupta, K. 2016. Oil price shocks, competition, and oil & gas stock returns - global
evidence. Energy Economics 57: 140-153.
Hamilton,
J.D. 2009. Understanding crude oil prices. The
Energy Journal 30(2): 179-206.
Hamilton,
J.D. 1989. A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series
and the business cycle. Econometrica 57: 357-384.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912559.
Hamidreza, M.
& Maryam, S. 2012. Point forecast Markov switching model for U.S. Dollar/
Euro exchange rate. Sains Malaysiana 41(4): 481-488.
Hansen,
B.E. 2001. The new econometrics of structural change: Dating breaks in US labour productivity. Journal
of Economic Perspectives 15(4): 117-128.
Hersugondo, S.E., Robiyanto, R., Wahyudi, S.
& Muharam, H. 2015. The world oil price movements
and stock returns in several Southeast Asia’s capital markets. IJABER 13(2):
527-534.
Hossenidoust, E., Janor, H., Yusefi, M., Majid,
H.A. & Ja'afar, R. 2013. Volatility spillovers
across commodity and stock markets among ASEAN countries. In Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia VIII (PERKEM VIII). Johor Bahru. pp.
1401-1412.
Hoque, M.E., Wah, L.S. & Shah
Zaidi, M.A. 2019. Oil price shocks, global economic policy uncertainty,
geopolitical risk, and stock price in Malaysia: Factor augmented VAR approach. Economic
Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 32(1): 3700-3732.
Hoque, M.E. & Shah Zaidi, M.A.
2019. The impacts of global economic policy uncertainty on stock market returns
in regime switching environment: Evidence from sectoral perspectives. International
Journal of Finance and Economics 24(2): 991-1016.
Ismail, M.T. & Isa, Z. 2006.
Modelling exchange rate using regime switching models. Sains Malaysiana 35(2): 55-62.
Kang, W., de Gracia, F. & Ratti, R. 2017. Oil
price shocks, policy uncertainty, and stock returns of oil and gas
corporations. Journal of International Money and Finance 70(C): 344-359.
Kilian,
L. 2009. Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply
shocks in the crude oil market. American
Economic Review 99(3): 1053-1069.
Kilian, L. & Park, C. 2009. The impact of oil price shocks on the U.S. Stock Market. International Economic Review 50(4): 1267-1287.
Kisswani, K.
2016. Does oil price variability
affect ASEAN exchange rates? Evidence from panel cointegration test. Applied
Economics 48(20): 1831-1839.
Kobayashi,
K., Rashid, K.A., Furuichi, M. & Anderson, W.P.
2018. Economic Integration and Regional
Development: The ASEAN Economic Community. New York: Routledge.
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P. & Shin, Y. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54(1-3): 159-178.
Lee, B., Yang, C.W. & Huang, B. 2012. Oil price movements and stock markets
revisited: A case of sector stock price indexes in the G-7 countries. Energy
Economics 34(5): 1284-1300.
Manal, A. & Tamat, S. 2020. The inter-relationship between commodity
energy prices and stock market volatility in Saudi-Arabia. Journal of
Nusantara Studies 5(1): 270-293.
Maneeju, P., Yamaka, W. & Sriboonchitta, S. 2018. Mixed-Copulas approach in examining
the relationship between oil prices and ASEAN’s stock markets. In Econometrics for Financial Applications. Germany: Springer. pp. 531-541.
Pan, M. & Nguyen, H. 2018. Export and growth in ASEAN: Does export destination matter? Journal
of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies 11(2): 122-131.
Ramos,
S.B. & Veiga, H. 2013. Oil price asymmetric
effects: Answering the puzzle in international stock markets. Energy
Economics 38: 136-145.
Ready, R.C. 2018. Oil consumption, economic
growth, and oil futures: The impact of long-run oil supply uncertainty on asset
prices. Journal of Monetary Economics 94: 1-26.
Reboredo, J.
2008. Nonlinear effects of oil shocks on stock returns: A Markov-switching
approach. Applied Economics 42(29): 3735-3744.
Sakane, K. 2018. ASEAN Integration: Opportunities and
Challenges. In Economic Integration and
Regional Development. New York: Routledge. pp. 11-33.
Sadorsky, P.
1999. Oil price shocks and stock market activity. Energy Economics 21: 449-469.
Samsuddin, S. & Ismail, N.
2019. Markov chain model and stationary test: A case study on Malaysia Social
Security (SOCSO). Sains Malaysiana 48(3): 697-701.
Uddin, G.S., Rahman, M.L., Shahzad, S.J.H. & Rehman, M.U. 2018. Supply and demand driven oil price changes and their non-linear impact on precious metal returns: A Markov regime switching approach. Energy Economics 73: 108-121.
Vu, T.K. & Nakata, H. 2018. Oil price fluctuations and the small open economies of Southeast Asia: An analysis using vector auto-regression with block exogeneity. Journal of Asian Economics 54: 1-21.
Wang, Y., Wu, C. & Yang, L. 2013. Oil price shocks and stock market activities: Evidence from oil-importing and oil-exporting countries. Journal of Comparative Economics 41: 1220-1239.
Zhu, H.,
Su, X., You, W. & Ren, Y. 2017. Asymmetric effects of oil price shocks on
stock returns: Evidence from a two-stage Markov regime-switching approach. Applied Economics 49: 2491-2507.
Zhu, M.
2013. Return distribution predictability and its implications for portfolio
selection. International Review of
Economics & Finance 27: 209-223.
*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email: hizuan@ukm.edu.my
|