A Comparison of Self-and Superior-Appraisals of Divisional Level Managers’ Performance in Selected Australian companies

School of Accountancy & Business
Nanyang Technological University,
Nanyang Ave., Singapore 2263


Abstract

This study reported the results of a comparison between self- and superior-appraisals of divisional level managers’ performance in selected Australian manufacturing companies, in terms of four psychometric properties: leniency errors, halo effects, convergent validity and discriminant validity. Significant differences existed between the managers’ and their superiors’ appraisals based on these criteria. The findings from this study provided further evidence on the performance appraisals issue and suggested that the exclusive use of the self-appraisal method in performance evaluation research should be viewed with caution. Further research using different settings and at different organisational levels would be warranted.

Keywords

Citation

Yap, T. H. (1995). A Comparison of Self-and Superior-Appraisals of Divisional Level Managers’ Performance in Selected Australian companies. Jurnal Pengurusan, 14, 105–117.

@article{yap1995comparison,
  title={A Comparison of Self-and Superior-Appraisals of Divisional Level Managers’ Performance in Selected Australian companies},
  author={Yap, Teoh Hai},
  journal={Jurnal Pengurusan},
 

volume={14},
  number={},
  pages={105—117},
  year={1995},
  doi={},
  publisher={Penerbit UKM},
}

Export Bibliography:

No. of views: 127

   

Article received:  
Accepted for publication:  
Available online: 

Issue logo

14 (1995) 105 – 117

Download PDF

Share via:

Receive updates when new articles are published