Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences Vol 22 No 5 (2018): 877 - 884

DOI: 10.17576/mjas-2018-2205-15

 

 

 

TOTAL FLAVONOIDS AND PHENOLIC CONTENTS OF STICKY AND HARD PROPOLIS FROM 10 SPECIES OF INDO-MALAYAN STINGLESS BEES

 

(Jumlah Kandungan Flavonoid dan Fenolik dalam Propolis yang Melekit dan Keras daripada 10 Spesis Lebah Kelulut Indo-Malayan)

 

Norafiza Awang1, Nora’aini Ali1*, Fadzilah Adibah Abd Majid2, Sofiah Hamzah1, Shamsul Bahri Abd Razak3

 

1School of Ocean Engineering

2Institute Marine Biotechnology

3School of Food Science and Technology

Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia

 

*Corresponding author:  noraaini@umt.edu.my

 

 

Received: 16 April 2017; Accepted: 7 March 2018

 

 

Abstract

The present works aimed to identify the total flavonoids content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activities of sticky and hard propolis of 10 species of Indo-Malayan stingless bee’s namely Heterotrigona itama (H. itama), Geniotrigona thoracica (G. thoracica), Homotrigona aliceae (H. aliceae), Homotrigona fimbriata (H. fimbriata), Tetrigona apicalis (T. apicalis), Tetrigona vidua (T. vidua), Tetrigona peninsularis (T. peninsularis), Lophotrigona canifrons (L. canifrons), Tetrigona melanoleuca (T. melanoleuca), and Tetrogona binghami (T. binghami). The ethanolic extracts of these propolis (EEP) were prepared and analysed for the determination of TFC using aluminium chloride method, TPC and antioxidant activity using the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical-scavenging assay system. The sticky propolis showed 91% of TFC and 49% of TPC higher than the hard propolis. Interestingly, the sticky propolis had stronger antioxidant activities than hard propolis for all species. The highest antioxidant activities were found in sticky propolis of H. itama which is 85% of DPPH degradation while the lowest antioxidant activity was found in the hard propolis of L. conifrons which is 5% of DPPH degradation. In conclusion, the data gathered in this study revealed that propolis from all 10 types of stingless bees’ species are biologically active. The selection of propolis for further development can be based on its biological activities, which vary according to the species of stingless bees.

 

Keywords:  stingless bees, propolis, total flavonoids content, total phenolic content

 

Abstrak

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti  jumlah kandungan flavonoid, jumlah kandungan fenolik dan aktiviti antioksidan dalam propolis yang melekit dan keras daripada 10 spesis lebah kelulut Indo-Malayan iaitu Heterotrigona itama (H. itama), Geniotrigona thoracica (G. thoracica), Homotrigona aliceae (H. aliceae), Homotrigona fimbriata (H. fimbriata), Tetrigona apicalis (T. apicalis), Tetrigona vidua (T. vidua), Tetrigona peninsularis (T. peninsularis), Lophotrigona canifrons (L. canifrons), Tetrigona melanoleuca (T. melanoleuca), dan Tetrogona binghami (T. binghami). Ekstrak etanolik propolis ini (EEP) telah disediakan dan dianalisis bagi menentukan jumlah kandungan flavonoid (TFC) dengan menggunakan kaedah aluminium klorida, jumlah kandungan fenolik (TPC) dan aktiviti antioksidan menggunakan 1,1-difenil-2-pikrilhidrazil (DPPH) sistem ujian berasaskan radikal bebas. Propolis yang melekit menunjukkan TFC 91% dan TPC 49% lebih tinggi daripada propolis keras. Menariknya, propolis yang melekit mempunyai aktiviti antioksidan yang lebih kuat daripada propolis keras untuk semua spesies. Aktiviti antioksidan tertinggi didapati dalam propolis yang melekat H. itama 85% degradasi DPPH manakala aktiviti antioksidan paling rendah didapati dalam propolis keras L.conifrons 5% degradasi DPPH. Kesimpulannya, data yang dikumpul dalam kajian ini mendedahkan bahawa propolis dari semua 10 jenis lebah adalah spesies biologi aktif. Pemilihan propolis untuk pembangunan selanjutnya boleh berdasarkan aktiviti biologinya, yang bervariasi mengikut spesies lebah tanpa ragu-ragu.

 

Kata kunci:  lebah kelulut, propolis, jumlah kandungan flavonoid, jumlah kandungan fenolik

 

References

1.       Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia (2009). Economic planning unit. Access from http://www.epu.gov.my/ web [Online 18 November 2009].

2.       Talaat, W.  I.  A.  W., Tahir N. M. and Mohd L. H. (2012). Sustainable management of forest biodiversity and the present Malaysian policy and legal framework. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(3): 76-83.

3.       Bankova, V., Trusheva, B. and Popova M. (2008). new developments in propolis chemical diversity studies. Transworld Research Network: pp. 1-13.

4.       Banskota A. H., Tezuka Y. and Kadota S. (2001). Recent progress in pharmacological research of propolis. Phytotherapy Research, 15(7): 561-571.

5.       Ghisalberti, E. L. (1979). Propolis: A review. Bee World, 60: 59-84.

6.       Greenaway, W., May, J., Scaysbrook, T. and Whatley, F. R. (1991). identification by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of 150 compounds in propolis. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 46(1-2): 111-121.

7.       Bonvehí Josep, S. and Coll Francesc, V. (1994). Phenolic composition of propolis from China and from South America. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 49(11-12): 712-718.

8.       Bankova, V., Dyulgerov, A., Popov, S. and Marekov, N. (1987). A GC/MS study of the propolis phenolic constituents. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 42(1-2): 147-151.

9.       Bonvehí, J. S., Coll, F. V. and Jordà, R. E. (1994). The composition, active components and bacteriostatic activity of propolis in dietetics. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 71(5): 529-532.

10.    Vennat, B., Arvouet-Grand, A., Gross, D. and Pourrat, A. (1995). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of flavonoids and identification of phenolic acids from a propolis extract. Journal De Pharmacie De Belgique, 50: 438-444.

11.    Ibrahim, N., Farah Shakila Mohd Niza, N., Rodi, M., Jamil Zakaria, A., Ismail, Z. and Mohd, K. (2016). Chemical and biological analyses of Malaysian stingless bee propolis extracts. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, 20(2): 413-422.

12.    Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R. and Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999). Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology, 299: 152-178.

13.    Kumazawa, S., Taniguchi, M., Suzuki, Y., Shimura, M., Kwon, M. S. and Nakayama, T. (2002). Antioxidant activity of polyphenols in carob pods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50(2): 373-377.

14.    Chang, C., Yang, M. and Wen, H. (2002). Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. Journal of Food Drug Analysis, 10(3): 178-182.

15.    Blois, M. S. (1958). Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature, 181: 1199-1200.

16.    Abu Bakar, M. F., Mohamed, M., Rahmat, A. and Fry, J. (2009). Phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of different parts of bambangan (Mangifera pajang) and Tarap (Artocarpus odoratissimus). Food Chemistry, 113(2): 479-483.

17.    Isla, M. I., Nieva Moreno, M. I., Sampietro, A. R. and Vattuone, M. A. (2001). Antioxidant activity of argentine propolis extracts. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 76(2): 165-170.

18.    Kumazawa, S., Hamasaka, T. and Nakayama, T. (2004). Antioxidant activity of propolis of various geographic origins. Food Chemistry, 84(3): 329-339.

19.    Osawa, T. (1994). Novel natural antioxidants for utilization in food and biological systems. postharvest biochemistry of plant food-materials in the tropics. Japan Scientific Press, Tokyo, Japan: pp. 241-251.

20.    Mallavadhani, U. V., Sudhakar, A. V. S., Satyanarayana, K. V. S., Mahapatra, A., Li, W. and vanBreemen, R. B. (2006). Chemical and analytical screening of some edible mushrooms. Food Chemistry, 95(1): 58-64.

21.    Ibrahim, N., Zakaria, A. J., Ismail, Z. and Mohd, K. (2016). Antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two Malaysian stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama and Geniotrigona thoracica. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research, 8(1): 156-161.

22.    Lin, S. Y., Liu, H. Y., Lu, Y. L. and Hou, W. C. (2005). Antioxidant activities of mucilages from different Taiwanese yam cultivars. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 46: 183-188.

23.    Kahkonen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., Vuorela, H. J., Rauha, J. P., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T. S. and Heinonen, M. (1999). Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47(10): 3954-3962.

24.    Hatano, T., Takagi, M., Ito, H. and Yoshida, T. (1997). Phenolic constituents of liquorice. VII. A new chalcone with a potent radical scavenging activity and accompanying phenolics from liquorice. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 45(9): 1485-1492.

25.    Tang, S. Z., Kerry, J. P., Sheehan, D. and Buckley, D. J. (2002). Antioxidative mechanisms of tea catechins in chicken meat systems. Food Chemistry, 76(1): 45-51.

 




Previous                    Content                    Next