Sains Malaysiana 41(12)(2012):
1527–1533
Limit of
DNA Barcode in Delineating Penaeus monodon and in its Developing Stages
(Had Penggunaan Barkod DNA untuk Menentukan Penaeus
monodon dan Peringkat Tumbesarannya)
C. Prasanna Kumar, S. Ajmal Khan & P.S. Lyla
Centre for Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of
Marine Biology
Annamalai University, Parangipettai – 608502, Tamil
Nadu, India
B. Akbar John* & K.C.A. Jalal
Department of Biotechnology, Kulliyyah of Science
International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Sultan
Ahmad Shah
Bandar Indera Mahkota, 25200, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
Diserahkan: 23 Mac 2011 / Diterima:
2Ogos 2012
ABSTRACT
Mysis, post larvae and adult specimens of Penaeus monodon were sequenced for
Cyctochrome C Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene (DNA barcode) to check the
efficiency of DNA barcode in delineating species irrespective of its different life
stages. COI gene sequences of different life stages of P. monodon were
subjected to pair-wise distance analysis, nucleotide sequence diversity
estimation, phylogenetic and BOLD analysis. The pair-wise distance
estimation revealed that intra-specific variations within the barcode sequences
of P. monodon were low when compared with other species of genus Penaeus
spp. The average pair-wise distance within the sequences of different stages
of P. monodon was two times lesser than the pair-wise distance of the
out-group used. The nucleotide diversity within the barcodes were low (π =
0.324). The constructed phylogram clearly showed that the DNA barcoding using
partial COI gene would provide an accurate delineation of species
irrespective of their different life stages. The BOLD analysis accurately
identified all sequences as belonging to P. monodon.
Keywords: COI; DNA barcoding; nucleotide diversity; pair-wise
distance; Penaeus monodon
ABSTRAK
Sampel mysis, anak pra-matang dan dewasa Peneaus monodon telah dianalisis mengggunakan
gen subunit I sitokrom C oksidase (COI) untuk menentukan keupayaan barkod DNA untuk mengenal pasti peringkat tumbesaran Peneaus monodon. Jujukan COI Peneaus
monodon pada peringkat yang berbeza telah dianalisis menggunakan kaedah jarak
pasangan demi pasangan, kepelbagaian jujukan nukleofida, filogenetik dan BOLD. Analisis jarak pasangan demi pasangan menunjukkan variasi intra-spesifik dalam
jujukan barkod Peneaus monodon adalah lebih rendah berbanding spesies Peneaus yang lain. Purata jarak pasangan demi pasangan pada peringkat berbeza Peneaus
monodon adalah dua kali lebih rendah berbanding kumpulan luar. Kepelbagaian
nukleotida dalam barkod adalah rendah (π= 0.324). Filogram yang dihasilkan
menunjukkan barkod DNA yang menggunakan gen COI mampu menentukan
tumbesaran spesies mengikut peringkatnya. Analisis BOLD pula menunjukkan
bahawa kesemua jujukan yang dihasilkan adalah Peneaus monodon.
Kata kunci: Barkod DNA; COI;
jarak pasangan demi pasangan; kepelbagaian jujukan nukleofida; Peneaus monodon
RUJUKAN
Ajmal Khan, S., Lyla, P.S., Akbar John, B., Prasanna Kumar,
C., Murugan, S. & Jalal, K.C.A. 2010. DNA barcoding of Stolephorus
indicus, Stolephorus commersonnii and Terapon jarbua of
Parangipettai coastal waters. Biotechnology 9(3): 373-377.
Akbar John, B., Prasanna Kumar,
Kamaruzzaman, B.Y. & Jalal, K.C.A. 2011. Revision on the molecular phylogeny of horseshoe crabs -
Part 1. In The Living Fossil (Horseshoe Crab)Kamaruzzaman Yunus, Akbar
John, Ahmed Jalal Khan Chowdhury & Zaleha Kassim (Eds.) (pp. 251-266). Kuantan:
IIUM Press.
Akbar John, B., Prasanna Kumar,
Kamaruzzaman, B.Y. & Jalal, K.C.A. 2011. Revision on the molecular phylogeny of horseshoe crabs
– Part 2. In: The Living Fossil (Horseshoe Crab). (pp. 267-274).Kamaruzzaman Yunus, Akbar John, Ahmed Jalal
Khan Chowdhury & Zaleha Kassim (Eds.). Kuantan: IIUM Press.
Azinuddin, M.A.M., Nataqain, S.M., Normah, M.N. & Vijay,
K. 2011. Isolation and identification of microsatellite repeat motifs from the Epinephelus
fuscoguttatus genome. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(43):
8553-8557.
Baldwin, J.D., Bass, A.L., Bowen, B.W.
& Clark, W.H. 1998. Molecular
phylogeny and phylogeography of marine shrimp Penaeus. Molecular
Phylogenetics Evolution 10(3): 399-407.
Benzie, J.A.H. 1998. Penaeid genetics and
biotechnology. Aquaculture 164: 23-47.
Boxshall, G.A. 2007. Crustacean classification: On-going
controversies and unresolved problems. Zootaxa 1668: 313-325.
Browdy, C.L. 1998. Recent developments in penaeid broodstock
and seed production technologies: Improving the outlook of superior captive
stocks. Aquaculture 164(1): 3-21.
Browne, W.E., Haddock, S.H. &
Martindale, M.Q. 2007. Phylogenetic
analysis of lineage relationship among hyperiid amphipods as revealed by
examination of the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome oxidase I (COI). Integrative and Comparative Biology 47: 815-830.
Bucklin, A., Frost, B.W. & Allen, L.D. 2003. Molecular systematic and phylogenetic assessment of 34 calanoid
copepod species of the Calanidae and Clausocalanidae. Marine Biology 142:
333-343.
Bucklin, A., Wiebe, P.H. & Smolenack, S.B. 2007. DNA barcodes for species identification of euphausiids
(Euphausiacea, Crustacea). Journal of Plankton Research 29:
483-493.
Chu, K.H., Ho, H.Y., Li, C.P. &
Chan, T.Y. 2003. Molecular phylogenetics of the mitten
crab species in Eriocheir, sensu lato (Brachyura, Grapsidae). Journal of
Crustacean Biology 23: 738-746.
Clare, E.L., Lim, B.K., Engstrom, M.D.,
Eger, J.L. & Hebert, P.D.N. 2007. DNA
barcoding of Neotropical bats: Species identification and discovery within
Guyana. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 184-190.
Costa, F.O., De-Waard, J.R. &
Boutillier, J. 2007. Biological
identifications through DNA barcodes: The case of the Crustacea. Canadean
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 272-295.
Cunningham, C.W., Blackstone, N.W.
& Buss, L.W. 1992. Evolution of king
crabs from hermit crab ancestors. Nature 355: 539-542.
Dall, W., Hill, B.J., Rothlisberg, P.W.
& Staples, D.J. 1990. The biology of Penaeidae. Advances in Marine Biology 27:
511-523.
Daniels, S.R., Stewart, B.A., Gouws,
G., Cunningham, M. & Matthee, C.A. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the southern African
freshwater crab fauna (Decapda: Potamonautidae; Potamonautes) derived from
multiple data sets reveal biogeographical patterning. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 25(3): 511-523.
Ebach, M.C. & Holdrege, C. 2005. More
taxonomy, not DNA barcoding. Bioscience 55: 822-823.
Englisch, U., Coleman, C.O. & Wagele, J.W. 2003. First
observations on the phylogeny of the families Gammaridae, Crangonyctidae,
Melitidae, Niphargidae, Megaluropidae and Oedicerotidae (Amphipoda, Crustacea),
using small subunit rRNA gene sequences. Journal of Natural History 37:
2461-2486.
Etter, R.J., Rex, M.A., Chase, M.C. & Quattro, J.M.
1999. A genetic dimension to deep-sea biodiversity. Deep-Sea
Research 46: 1095-1099.
Flegel, T.W. 2007. Right to refuse revision in the genus Penaeus.
Aquaculture 264(4): 2-8.
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek,
R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial
cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular
Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294-299.
Gusmao,
J., Lazoski, C. & Sole-Cava, A.M. 2000. A new species of Penaeus (Crustacea:
Penaeidae) revealed by allozyme and cytochrome oxidase I analyses. Marine
Biology 137: 435-446.
Hajibabaei, M.,
Janzen, D.H., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert. P.D.N. 2006. DNA
barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 968-971.
Haye, P.A., Tam, Y.K. & Kornfield, I. 2002. Molecular
phylogenetics of molecrabs (Hippidae: Emerita). Journal of Crustacean
Biology 22: 903-915.
Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball,
S.L. & DeWaard, J.R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings
of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:
313-321.
Hebert, P.D.N., Stoeckle, M.Y., Zemlak,
T.S. & Francis, C.M. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLOS
Biology 2: 1657-1663.
Holthuis, L.B. 1980. Shrimps and prawns of
the world. An annotated catalogue of species of
interest to fisheries. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 1. FAO Fisheries Synopsis, FAO,
Roma.
Hou, Z., Fu, J. & Li, S. 2007. A molecular phylogeny of
the genus Gammarus (Crustacea: Malacostraca) based on mitochondrial and
nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45:
596-611.
Hubert, N., Delrieu-Trottin, E., Irisson, J-O., Meyer, C.
& Planes, S. 2010. Identifying coral reef fish larvae through DNA
barcoding: A test case with the families Acanthuridae and Holocentridae. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 55(3): 1195-1203.
Hubert, N., Hanner, R. & Holm, E.
2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes
through DNA barcodes. Plos One 3: 1-8.
Khamnamtong, B., Klinbunga, S. & Menasveta, P. 2005. Species identification of five Penaeid shrimps using
PCR-RFLP and SSCP analyses of 16S Ribosomal DNA. Journal of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 38(4): 491-499.
Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary
rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.
Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120.
Knowlton, N. 1993. Sibling species in the sea. Annual
Reviewes Ecological System 24: 189-216.
Knowlton, N. 2000. Molecular genetic analyses of species
boundaries in the sea. Hydrobiologia 420: 73-90.
Lavery, S., Chan, T.Y., Tam, Y.K. &
Chu, K.H. 2004. Phylogentic relationship and
evolutionary history of genus Penaeus s.l. derived from mitochondrial
DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 39-49.
Lorenz, J.G., Jackson, W.E., Beck, J.C.
& Hanner, R. 2005. The
problems and promise of DNA barcodes for species diagnosis of primate
biomaterials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
Biological Science 360: 1869-1877.
Mokhtar, M.A.A., Normah, M.N., Kumar, S.V. & Baharum,
S.N. 2011. Characterization of 10 novel microsatellite loci
for the brown marbled grouper, Epinephelus fuscoguttatus (Serranidae). Genetics and Molecular Research 10(2): 885-888.
Pérez-Farfante, I. & Kensley, B.
1997. Penaeoid and Sergestoid Shrimps and
Prawns of the World. Editions du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle,
Paris, France.
Quan, J., Lu, X.M. & Zhuang, Z. 2001. Low genetic
variation of Penaeus chinensis as revealed by mitochondrial COI and 16S
rRNA gene sequences. Biochemical Genetics 39: 279-284.
Rathnasingham, S. & Hebert, P.D.N. 2007 BOLD: Barcoding
of Life Data system (www.barcodinglife.com) Molecular Ecology Notes 7(3): 355-364.
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. 1987. Neighbor joining method: A new method for constructing
phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology Evolution 4: 406-425.
Schander, C. & Willassen, E. 2005. What can biological
barcoding do for marine biology? Mar. Biol. Res. 1: 79-83.Tajima, F.
1989. Statistical methods to test for nucleotide mutation
hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. 2007. MEGA4:
Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular
Biology Evolution 24: 1596-1599.
Tang, R.W., Yaum, C. & Ng, W.C.
2010. Identification of stomatopod larvae
(Crustacea: Stomatopoda) from Hong Kong waters using DNA barcodes. Molecular
Ecology Resources 10(3): 439-448.
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak,
F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D.G. 1997. The ClustalXwindows interface: Flexible strategies for
multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids
Research 25: 4876-4882.
Thorpe, J.P., Sole-Cava, A.M. & Watts, P.C. 2000.
Exploited marine invertebrates: Genetics and fisheries. In: Marine Genetics Sole-Cava,
A. M., Russo, C.A.M. & Thorpe, J. M. (eds) Drodrecth: Kluwer Academic Publisher. pp.165-184.
Vainola, R., Vainio, J.K. & Palo,
J.U. 2001. Phylogeography of
‘glacial relict’ Gammaracanthus (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from boreal lakes and
the Caspian and White seas. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic
Sciences 58: 2247-2257.
Ward, R.D., Zemlak, T.S. & Innes,
B.H. 2005. DNA barcoding
Australia’s fish species. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of
London B 360: 1847-1857.
Webb, K.E., Barnes, D.K.A., Clark, M.S.
& Bowden, D.A. 2006. DNA barcoding: A
molecular tool to identify Antarctic marine larvae. Deep Sea Research Part
II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 53(8-10): 1053-1060.
Will, K.W., Mishler, B.D. & Wheeler, Q.D. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systems Biology 54: 844-851.
Will, K.W. & Rubinoff, D. 2004. Myth of the molecule:
The DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and
classification. Cladistics —Int. J. Willi Hennig
Soc. 20: 47-55.
Wilson, E.O. 2003. The encyclopedia of
life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 77-80.
*Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email:
akbarjohn50@gmail.com