Sains Malaysiana 43(5)(2014): 649–654
Effect
of Acute Stevia Consumption on Blood Glucose Response in Healthy Malay Young
Adults
(Kesan Pengambilan Stevia Akut ke atas Tindak Balas Glukosa
Darah dalam Kalangan Orang Melayu Dewasa yang Sihat)
NORAZLANSHAH HAZALI*1, AZIZAH
MOHAMED1, MUHAMMAD
IBRAHIM1, MASHITA
MASRI1, KHAIRIL
ANUAR
MD
ISA2, NORAZMIR
MD
NOR2, MOHD
KHAN
AYOB3& FAZLYLA NADYA MOHD
FADZLAN1
1Department
of Nutrition Sciences, Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International
Islamic University Malaysia, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
2Faculty
of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus
42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor,
D.E. Malaysia
3School
of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Department of Food Science,
Faculty of
Science and Technology, Universiti
Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, D.E. Malaysia
Received: 6 December 2012/Accepted:
31 July 2013
ABSTRACT
Previously, researchers had
initiated investigation to find an alternative drug that can treat diabetes
mellitus without dragging patients into more complicated health problems. After
many studies, they found a new and high potential plant-based drug named stevia
that is able to reduce diabetic patients’ blood glucose. This study aimed to
determine the effect of stevia on blood glucose of healthy subjects. The study
was carried out by comparing the glycemic response between sucrose and stevia
(500 and 1000 mg) among 32 subjects aged between 18 and 23 years old. Subjects
were required to fast 8 to 10 h prior to each test which was done on different
days. Finger prick test were done on 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min to construct a
blood sugar response curve for 2 h period. There is a significant difference
between the glycemic response of sucrose and stevia 500 mg. Sucrose
significantly increased the post prandial blood glucose while stevia 500 mg
reduced blood glucose after 30 min of consumption. Sucrose also produced higher
glycemic response at min-30 when compared with stevia 1000 mg. There is no
significant difference between the glycemic response of stevia of different
dose, 500 and 1000 mg. No dose-dependent effect was observed in this study. In
conclusion, stevia does not raise blood glucose significantly when consumed in
short period. Stevia is effective to be used by healthy people to maintain
blood glucose even when consumed in short length of time.
Keywords:
Glycemic response; natural sweetener; stevia rebaudiana
ABSTRAK
Sebelum ini,
para penyelidik telah menjalankan kajian bagi mencari ubat alternatif yang
mampu merawat diabetes melitus tanpa menyebabkan masalah kesihatan yang lebih
rumit dalam kalangan pesakit. Kajian ini
dijalankan bertujuan untuk menentukan kesan stevia ke atas kandungan glukosa dalam darah subjek sihat. Kajian ini
telah dijalankan dengan membandingkan tindak balas glisemik antara sukrosa
dengan stevia (500 dan 1000 mg) dalam kalangan 32 subjek berumur 18
hingga 23 tahun. Subjek dikehendaki berpuasa 8 hingga 10 jam sebelum setiap
ujian dijalankan. Ujian cucuk jari telah dijalankan pada min
0, 30, 60, 90 dan 120 untuk membina lengkuk tindak balas gula dalam darah dalam
tempoh dua jam. Terdapat perbezaan yang bererti antara tindak balas
glisemik dengan stevia 500 mg. Sukrosa meningkatkan glukosa darah pos
prandial secara signifikan sementara stevia 500 mg menurunkan glukosa
darah selepas 30 min pengambilan. Sukrosa juga menghasilkan tindak balas
glisemik pada min ke 30 berbanding stevia 1000 mg. Tiada perbezaan yang
signifikan antara tindak balas glisemik stevia yang berlainan dos, 500
dan 1000 mg. Tiada kesan kebergantungan kepada dos diperhatikan dalam kajian
ini. Kesimpulannya, stevia tidak
meningkatkan glukosa darah dengan signifikan apabila diambil dalam tempoh masa
yang singkat.Stevia adalah efektif untuk
digunakan oleh individu sihat yang mahu mengawal glukosa darah walaupun diambil
dalam tempoh masa yang singkat.
Kata kunci: Pemanis semula jadi; stevia
rebaudiana; tindak balas glisemik
REFERENCES
American Diabetes Association. 2011.
Diabetes statistics.
http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics. Accessed on 24
January.
Anton, S.D., Martin, C.K., Han, H., Coulan, S., Cefalu, W.T.,
Geiselman, P. & Williamson, D.A. 2010. Effects of
stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial
glucose and insulin levels. Appetite 55(1): 37-43.
Barriocanal, L.A., Palacios, M., Benitez, G., Benitez, S.,
Jimenez, J.T., Jimenez, N. & Rojas, V. 2008. Apparent
lack of pharmacological effect of steviol glycosides used as sweeteners in
humans. A pilot study of repeated exposures in some
normotensive and hypotensive individuals and in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 51: 37-41.
Brouns, F.,
Bjorck, I., Frayn, K.N., Gibbs, A.L., Lang, V., Slama, G. & Wolever, T.M.
2005. Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr. Res. Rev. 18:
145-171.
Chan, P., Tomlinson, B., Chen, Y.J., Liu, J.C., Hsieh, M.H. &
Cheng, J.T. 2000. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effectiveness and
tolerability of oral stevioside in human hypertension. Br. J. Clin.
Pharmacol. 50(3): 215-220.
Chatsudthipong,
V. & Muanprasat, C. 2009. Stevioside and related compounds: therapeutic
benefits beyond sweetness. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 121: 41-54.
Elkins, R.
1997. Stevia. Natures Sweetener. New
York: Woodland Publication.
Geuns, J.M.
2003. Stevia. Phytochemistry 64(5): 913-921.
Geuns,
J.M.C., Buyse, J., Vankeirsbilck, A. & Temme, E.H. 2007. Metabolism
of stevioside by healthy subjects. Exp. Biol. Med. 232(1):
164-173.
Hull, J.S.
2002. Saccharin. http://www.sweetpoison.com/ aspartame-sweeteners.html.
Accessed on 24 January.
Mahan, L. &
Escott-Stump, S. 2008. Krause's Food and Nutrition Therapy. 12th
ed. Missouri: Elsevier Inc.
Malaysian Diabetes Association. 2008. Watch
those sugar levels. http://www.diabetes.org.my/article.php?aid=426. Accessed on
24 February 2011.
National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse. 2011.
National Diabetes Statistics. http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/DM/PUBS/
statistics/#ddY20. Accessed on 24 January.
Savita,
S.M., Sheela, K., Sunanda, S., Shankar, A.G. & Parama, R. 2004. Stevia rebaudiana – a functional component for food
industry. J. Hum. Ecol. 15(4): 261-264.
Suzana, S.,
Rafidah, G., Noor Aini, M.Y., Nik Shanita, S., Zahara, A.M. & Shahrul
Azman, M.N. 2009. Atlas of Food Exchanges and Portion
Sizes. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: MDC Publishers.
Wolever,
T.M.S. 2004. Effect of blood sampling schedule and method of
calculating the area under the curve on validity and precision of glycaemic
index values. Br. J. Nutr. 91: 295-300.
Zainal
Ariffin, O. 2013. Healthy lifestyle programmes and other government efforts in
combating NCDs in Malaysia. Paper work on NSM NCD
Conference 2013. Organised by Nutrition Society Malaysia (NSM).
Kuala Lumpur, 26-27 March.
*Corresponding author; email: norazlanshah@iium.edu.my
|