Sains Malaysiana 41(11)(2012): 1377–1387
Comparisons
between the Window-Based and Storm-Event Analysis
(Perbezaan antara Analisis Berdasarkan Tingkap dan Analisis Kejadian
Ribut)
Noratiqah Mohd Ariff*
& Abdul Aziz Jemain
School of Mathematical Sciences,Faculty of Science and Technology,
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Received: 17 October 2011 / Accepted: 29 May 2012
ABSTRACT
Rainfalls data have been broadly used in researches including in
hydrological and meteorological areas. Two common ways in extracting
observations from hourly rainfalls data are the window-based analysis (WBA)
and storm-event analysis (SEA) approach. However, the differences in the
qualitative and quantitative properties of both methods are still vaguely
discussed. The aim of studying these dissimilarities is to understand the
effects of each approach in modelling and analysis. The qualitative difference
is due to the way the two analyses define the accumulated rainfalls for
observations which are referred to as rainfall and storm depths, respectively.
The repetitiveness of rainfall depths provide nested structure while the storm
depths are considered independent. The quantitative comparisons include their
statistical and scaling properties that are linked by the self-similarity
concept from simple scaling characteristics. If self-similarity concept holds,
then the rainfall or storm depths follow simple scaling and the analysis would
be simplified. The rainfall depths showed clearer simple scaling
characteristics compared to the storm depths. Though the storm depths do not
yield self-similarity for a large range of storm duration but the
characteristics of simple scaling can be observed for a reduced range of the
considered duration. In general, the context of the research and the region of
the time interval and duration will be important aspects to consider in
choosing which method is best to use for analyzing the data.
Keywords: Rainfalls analysis; self-similarity concept; simple
scaling; storm events
ABSTRAK
Data hujan telah diguna pakai dalam pelbagai
kajian termasuk dalam bidang hidrologi dan meteorologi. Terdapat dua kaedah yang biasa digunakan untuk
mengekstrak maklumat daripada data hujan setiap jam iaitu analisis berdasarkan
tingkap dan analisis kejadian ribut. Walau bagaimanapun,
perbezaan secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif kedua-dua analisis belum pernah
dibincangkan dengan jelas. Tujuan mempelajari kelainan
ini adalah untuk memahami kesan setiap kaedah tersebut terhadap permodelan dan
analisis hujan. Perbezaan kualitatif antara kedua-dua
analisis adalah disebabkan cara hujan terkumpul didefinisikan. Hujan terkumpul ini masing-masing ditulis sebagai kedalaman hujan
dan kedalaman ribut. Pengulangan data yang digunakan
dalam analisis berdasarkan tingkap menyebabkan kedalaman hujan mempunyai
struktur bersarang manakala kedalaman ribut dianggap sebagai pemboleh ubah tak
bersandar. Perbandingan kuantitatif pula terdiri
daripada ciri statistik dan ciri berkala yang berkait rapat melalui konsep
serupa daripada struktur berkala mudah. Jika konsep serupa diri ini
dipenuhi, ini bermakna kedalaman hujan atau ribut itu mengikut sifat berkala
mudah dan analisis akan menjadi lebih senang. Kedalaman hujan menunjukkan ciri berkala mudah yang lebih jelas
berbanding pemboleh ubah kedalaman ribut. Walaupun
kedalaman ribut tidak mempamerkan sifat serupa diri bagi julat tempoh ribut
yang besar, tetapi sifat berkala mudah ini dapat dilihat pada pemboleh ubah
tersebut jika julat ini dikecilkan untuk tempoh tertentu. Secara keseluruhannya, konteks kajian dan julat selang masa hujan
atau tempoh ribut adalah aspek penting yang perlu diambil kira dalam memilih
kaedah yang paling sesuai untuk menganalisis data hujan.
Kata kunci: Analisis hujan; berkala mudah; kejadian
ribut; konsep serupa diri
REFERENCES
Ceresetti, D., Molinié, G. &
Creutin, J.D. 2010. Scaling properties
of heavy rainfall at short duration: A regional analysis. Water Resources
Research 46(9): W09531.
Chiew, F.H.S., Kirono, D.G.C., Kent, D.M., Frost, A.J.,
Charles, S.P., Timbal, B., Nguyen, K.C. & Fu, G. 2010. Comparison of runoff
modelled using rainfall from different downscaling methods for historical
future climates. Journal of Hydrology 387(1-2): 10-23.
De Michele, C., Zenoni, E., Pecora, S.
& Rosso, R. 2011. Analytical
derivation of rain intensity-duration-area-frequency relationships from event
maxima. Journal of Hydrology 399(3-4): 385-393.
Deni, S.M., Suhaila, J., Wan Zin, W.Z. & Jemain, A.A.
2008. Tracing trends in the sequences of dry and wet days
over Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Science and
Technology 1(3): 97-110.
Gupta, V.K. & Waymire, E. 1990. Multiscaling properties
of spatial rainfall and river flow distributions. Journal of Geophysical
Research 95(D3): 1999-2009.
Kao, S.C. & Govindaraju, R.S. 2007. Probabilistic
structure of storm surface runoff considering the dependence between average
intensity and storm duration of rainfall events. Water Resources
Research 43(6): W06410.
Kao, S.C. & Govindaraju, R.S. 2008. Trivariate
statistical analysis of extreme rainfall events via the Plackett family of
copulas. Water Resources Research 44(2): W02415.
Lebel, T. & Ali, A. 2009. Recent trends in the central and western Sahel rainfall
regime (1990-2007). Journal of Hydrology 375(1-2): 52-64.
Palynchuk, B. & Guo, Y. 2008. Threshold
analysis of rainstorm depth and duration statistics at Toronto, Canada. Journal
of Hydrology 348(3-4): 535-545.
Restrepo-Posada, P.J. & Eagleson,
P.S. 1982. Identification of
independent rainstorms. Journal of Hydrology 55(1-4): 303-319.
Singh, V.P. & Zhang, L. 2007. IDFcurves
using the Frank Archimedean copula. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 12: 651-662.
Suhaila, J. & Jemain, A.A. 2009. Investigating the
impacts of adjoining wet days on the distribution of daily rainfall amounts in
Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Hydrology 368(1-4): 17-25.
Vanderberghe, S., Verhoest, N.E.C.,
Onof, C. & De Baets, B. 2011. A
comparative copula-based bivariate frequency analysis of observed and simulated
storm events: A case study on bartlett-lewis modeled rainfall. Water
Resources Research 47(7): W07529.
Villarini, G., Smith, J.A., Baeck,
M.L., Vitolo, R., Stephenson, D.B. & Krajewski, W.F. 2011. On the frequency of heavy rainfall for the midwest of the United States. Journal of Hydrology 400(1-2):
103-120.
Wan Zin, W.Z., Jamaludin, S., Deni, S.M. & Jemain, A.A.
2010. Recent changes in extreme rainfall events in Peninsular Malaysia:
1971-2005. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 99(3): 303-314.
Zhang, L. & Singh, V.P. 2007. Bivariate
rainfall frequency distributions using Archimedean copulas. Journal
of Hydrology 332(1-2): 93-109.
*Corresponding
author; email: tqah@ukm.my
|